GDPR Article 22 — Automated Decision-Making

GDPR Article 22 — Automated Decision-Making — 100% of in-scope requirements covered.

4 requirements · 3 in scope (3 enforced) · 1 out-of-scope (outside KYE™’s authority layer). The 100% is weighted over the in-scope base.

GDPR Article 22: requirement → the KYE™ artefact that enforces it

Demo data

You learn: Which requirements KYE™ enforces at runtime and with which artefact. You can: Walk the requirements.

How this widget is built
Demonstrates
KYE™ Compliance Mapping Rail™
Components
  • Framework requirement (clause)
  • Coverage status
  • KYE™ enforcement artefact (event, decision-record field, Evidence Pack™ entry)
Flow
Clause → status → the KYE™ artefact that enforces it, enforced requirements first. Architecture diagram
Used on

Source: Article 22 of the GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) gives data subjects the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal or similarly significant effects, save in specified cases where suitable safeguards must apply — including the right to obtain human intervention, to express their point of view, and to contest the decision (Recital 71), and the right to meaningful information about the logic involved (Articles 13–15). In insurance, an automated underwriting decline or claims denial is a similarly-significant-effect decision. KYE Protocol™ governs whether an AI-assisted decision in scope may PROCEED — under a recorded named-authority (the safeguard of human involvement), with a recorded adverse-action reason-code (meaningful information about the logic), and an appeal / contestability record (the right to human intervention and to contest). KYE™ does not make the underwriting decision, price the risk, or replace the human reviewer. · License: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 is published in the Official Journal of the EU; KYE™ registry paraphrases each requirement's intent and cites the article / recital for mapping purposes only.

By category

CategoryReqsEnforcedDesignedAdvisoryDeferredCoverage
Human involvement / named-authority safeguard (Art. 22(3))11000100%
Right to contest & human intervention (Recital 71)11000100%
Meaningful information about the logic / adverse-action reason (Art. 13–15)11000100%
Lawful basis, substantive decision & pricing on the merits100000%

Every requirement → the KYE™ artefact that enforces it

IDTitleStatusKYE™ enforcement
gdpr-automated-decision.art22-human-involvement-safeguardA similarly-significant automated decision proceeds only under a recorded named-authority (human-involvement safeguard)enforcedaudit_events: kye.purpose.request.v1, kye.purpose.admissibility.v1, kye.evidence.decision_map.v1
engines: internal, internal
rule_packs: kye:rule-pack:insurance-underwriting-claims
dictionaries: internal
constitution_refs: constitution/12-PURPOSE-PERMISSION.md
gdpr-automated-decision.art22-contest-human-interventionThe data subject's right to contest and to human intervention is recorded as an appeal / contestability recordenforcedaudit_events: kye.evidence.pack.v1, kye.replay.context_seal.v1, kye.replay.proof.v1
engines: internal, internal
rule_packs: kye:rule-pack:insurance-underwriting-claims
constitution_refs: constitution/13-RESILIENCE-LOOP.md, constitution/21-DELEGATED-AUDITABILITY.md
gdpr-automated-decision.art13-15-meaningful-information-logicThe data subject receives meaningful information about the logic — a recorded adverse-action reason-codeenforcedaudit_events: kye.evidence.decision_map.v1, kye.evidence.pack.v1
engines: internal, internal
rule_packs: kye:rule-pack:insurance-underwriting-claims
constitution_refs: constitution/13-RESILIENCE-LOOP.md
gdpr-automated-decision.lawful-basis-substantive-decisionLawful basis for the processing, the substantive decision, and risk pricing on the meritsout-of-scope(no enforcement cited)

Canonical KYE™ surfaces referenced on this page: KYE Protocol™.