KYE™ Research Library™

The KYE™ Research Library™ — published research you verify, not research you trust.

Every published report here is held to the same bar KYE Protocol™ holds a regulated AI decision to: no claim ships without a cited, pinned source (NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001); every report is sealed and Ed25519-signed over the published keys; any reader can confirm the seal offline in roughly 30 lines of code. Filter the library by series, format, sector, audience or cadence, search by keyword, or click any tag to narrow the shelf.

Where the reports live

Every report that has cleared the eight-stage governed lifecycle is published on one shelf — the Published Reports page — where you can filter the full set by series, format, sector, audience or cadence, search by keyword, and click any tag to narrow the shelf. This page is the rail behind that shelf: how a report gets there, and how you verify it once it does.

Go to published reports

The eight-stage governed lifecycle

Each report works through the same governed lifecycle before it is published — topic selection, governed gather, no-hallucination synthesis, evidence pack, seal, render, distribute, verify. Topics are listed honestly as planned until they are published, and the library never pre-generates the full combinatorial space.

How a library report is governed

  • No claim without a cited source — every assertion binds to a source pinned as evidence; an un-pinned source cannot be cited.
  • Sealed and signed — the report envelope is sealed and Ed25519-signed over the published JWKS; the rendered web, email and PDF editions are all covered by the same seal.
  • Verifiable offline — each report's public-key footer points at the published keys; any reader confirms the seal without contacting a KYE™ service.
  • Honest scope — KYE Protocol™ governs actions and authorities, not outcomes, diagnoses or results; the library publishes market-facing governed research synthesised from external public sources.

Research reports are distinct from the per-tenant compliance reports the Reporting Engine derives from a tenant's own audit chain — different reader, different evidence source. Ready to read? Browse the published reports.

Canonical KYE™ surfaces referenced on this page: KYE Protocol™.

  • Adaptive AI Governance Needs a Runtime Authority LayerAI governance is converging on a single structural conclusion: written policy and pre-deployment assessment are necessary but not sufficient.
  • AI Legal BriefA financial-stability regulator has, in effect, told the market that a paragraph of instructions is not a control — reporting based on publicly available…
  • AI Legal Brief (KYE™ Research Library™)A German court has held that an AI provider is responsible for the answers its AI presents, and that the responsibility cannot be shifted to the reader…
  • KYE™ Authority Pulse™The KYE™ Authority Pulse™ is the weekly bulletin of what changed inside the KYE Protocol™ canon — new governance chapters, new frameworks under mapping, new…
  • KYE™ Governed Proposal Authority™KYE™ Governed Proposal Authority™ turns a SERPRO governed data-query partnership context into a deterministic, fully-cited, replay-sealed proposal.
  • Returns to ExpertiseAs agentic tools get better at execution, the durable value moves to judgment — and judgment, made enforceable at the moment of action, is what governance is.
  • Roadmap to AI Adoption in HealthcareHealthcare organisations are adopting AI into clinical and operational decisions — triage, diagnosis support, documentation, scheduling, prior authorisation…
  • Roadmap to AI Governance for Financial ServicesFinancial institutions are deploying AI into decisions that regulators already supervise — creditworthiness, fraud, market and model risk — faster than their…
  • Securing enterprise AI agentsThe industry now agrees on how to secure an enterprise AI agent — and that agreement stops one layer short of authority.
  • The authority that outlived its purposeThe loudest AI-governance fear is the rogue agent.
  • The noyb questionDigital-rights enforcement has moved from "do you have a privacy policy?" to "prove what happened" — and most organisations cannot answer at execution time.
  • The ROI of Governed AI ActionThe return on AI is no longer in doubt — and that is precisely why governance is now the constraint that matters.
  • The Say-Do Gap in AI GovernanceThere is a measurable gap between what organisations say about their AI governance and what they can actually prove — and that gap is invisible until the first…
  • Turncoat agentsThe headline insider threat of 2026 is not a disgruntled employee — it is an AI agent that was manipulated into turning against the organisation that runs it.