You are:
board / CIO / CISO / risk / compliance / legal / finance lead. AI agents already touch your business; nobody has shown you the chain of authority behind their actions.
Engagement model
Open spec first. Trust layer second. We publish the protocol. We invite expert review. We ship a reference build. We run pilots in regulated sectors. We certify against a public registry. Seven paths below — pick the one that fits your role.
The model in one diagram
Path 1 / 7 · Experts
You are: open-banking architect, payments specialist, identity / IAM lead, OAuth/OIDC committee member, AI-governance researcher, audit / cybersecurity / regulated-finance expert, legal-tech reviewer.
You want: the protocol primitives surfaced clearly enough that you can critique the model end-to-end — and tell us where it breaks.
What we ask: not “what do you think?” — specific questions, against specific artefacts.
actor → principal → capability → scope → state → decision → evidence map cleanly to your domain?Path 2 / 7 · Developers
You are: engineer, architect, platform-team lead, agentic-runtime developer, MCP integrator.
You want: to touch the protocol — not read marketing — in one sitting.
The 10-minute path:
POST /v1/entitiesPOST /v1/delegationsPOST /v1/authority-grantsPOST /v1/runtime/authorizeallow_with_constraints / require_approval / denyGET /v1/decisions/{id}/mapGET /v1/proof-bundles/{id}Path 3 / 7 · Buyers
board / CIO / CISO / risk / compliance / legal / finance lead. AI agents already touch your business; nobody has shown you the chain of authority behind their actions.
to know what KYE™ reduces — liability, audit cost, incident-response time, regulatory ambiguity — before any procurement conversation.
the . 60–90 minutes. We work through one of your real agent flows live. KYE™ Authority Mapping Workshop
an authority map, a delegation map, a capability map, the risk areas, the evidence gaps, and a written pilot recommendation. No slides; the artefact the deliverable. is
Path 4 / 7 · Auditors
internal audit, GRC, 3PAO assessor, SOC 2 / ISO 27001 lead auditor, EU AI Act notified body, FedRAMP assessor.
to verify a real signed artefact end-to-end with public keys alone — no read-access to the customer’s runtime.
sample evidence pack · sample Decision Map™ · sample control-mapping projection · sample conformance report · sample self-attestation · sample audit-trail replay. Each downloadable, each signed, each verifiable offline.
Path 5 / 7 · Regulators
supervisor / examiner at a financial-services authority, data-protection authority, AI Act notified body, NIS2 CSIRT, sector regulator.
to know exactly which obligations the protocol claims to evidence — and which it does not.
289 control mappings across 13 horizontal frameworks (SOC 2 · ISO 27001:2022 · PCI DSS 4.0 · PSD2/PSD3 · DORA · NIS2 · EU AI Act · ISO 42001 · NIST AI RMF · NIST 800-207 · NIST CSF · GDPR · FedRAMP) plus sector overlays. Honest non-goals are documented in the threat-model page. We deliberately do not say “KYE™ makes you compliant”; we say . KYE™ produces evidence; certifications remain the customer’s
Path 6 / 7 · Partners
You are: IAM vendor, KYC/KYB/KYA vendor, open-banking platform, payment gateway, agent platform, MCP host, wallet provider, policy engine, SIEM/GRC tool, audit firm, consultancy.
You want: KYE™ to recognise your product as a first-class integration with a documented profile, a conformance fixture, and a public listing.
The integration ladder:
Commercial SKU ladder — the partnership-economics track that sits alongside the L1–L4 conformance ladder (Universal Engagement Rail):
Path 7 / 7 · Enterprises
You are: a regulated enterprise — bank, insurer, asset manager, custody desk, hospital network, telecom, energy operator, federal agency — with at least one AI agent in production or imminent.
You want: a 2–4 week proof that KYE™ answers who acted, on whose behalf, with what authority, in what state, with what evidence for a real flow.
The pilot scope — pick one:
Deliverables — produced live, not slides:
/v1/runtime/authorize decision endpointOutcome: a single-paragraph artefact you can put in front of your regulator, board, or external auditor — “Here is exactly how KYE™ proves who or what acted, on behalf of whom, using which capability, under what authority, in what state, and with what evidence.”
Working groups · open governance
KYE Protocol™ is governed in the open. Six working groups meet on GitHub Discussions; minutes + decisions are public; profile RFCs are accepted via the standard contribution process. Membership is open to anyone with operational expertise in the relevant domain.
RFC contribution
kyeprotocol.com/schemas/ or kyeprotocol.com/developers/api/) with the schema + OpenAPI op + at least one example.kyeprotocol.com/compliance/.$id. Profile lands in the next minor release.Security disclosure: see SECURITY.md. Trademark policy: see legal page.
Procurement pack · under NDA
Tier-1 banks and government procurement teams need detail beyond the public surface: the full Reference-Gateway hardening register (env-var inventory, middleware modules, audit-chain backends), the operator runbook bundle (Tier-1 onboarding, incident response, DR/BCP, GDPR DPA / ROPA / DSR, customer SLA, sub-processor inventory, key rotation, regulator comms templates), the attestation roadmap (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / FedRAMP timing), the HSM / KMS integration matrix, and the supply-chain controls. We don’t publish that on the open web. We package it.
No click-through NDAs. Real countersignature, real audit trail, real delivery SLA. Procurement teams expect this; we won’t pretend otherwise.
Where to go next
Start in shadow mode. We’ll deliver your first Evidence Pack™ in 4–8 weeks.
Canonical KYE™ surfaces referenced on this page: Authority Graph™ · Evidence Pack™ · KYE Protocol™ · Universal Engagement Rail.